Object Storage Overview
Object storage exposes an S3 API and or a Swift API to the storage cluster for applications to put and get data.
Prerequisites¶
This guide assumes a Rook cluster as explained in the Quickstart.
Configure an Object Store¶
Rook can configure the Ceph Object Store for several different scenarios. See each linked section for the configuration details.
- Create a local object store with dedicated Ceph pools. This option is recommended if a single object store is required, and is the simplest to get started.
- Create one or more object stores with shared Ceph pools. This option is recommended when multiple object stores are required.
- Create one or more object stores with pool placement targets and storage classes. This configuration allows Rook to provide different object placement options to object store clients.
- Connect to an RGW service in an external Ceph cluster, rather than create a local object store.
- Configure RGW Multisite to synchronize buckets between object stores in different clusters.
Note
Updating the configuration of an object store between these types is not supported.
Rook has the ability to either deploy an object store in Kubernetes or to connect to an external RGW service. Most commonly, the object store will be configured in Kubernetes by Rook. Alternatively see the external section to consume an existing Ceph cluster with Rados Gateways from Rook.
Create a Local Object Store with S3¶
The below sample will create a CephObjectStore
that starts the RGW service in the cluster with an S3 API.
Note
This sample requires at least 3 OSDs, with each OSD located on a different node.
The OSDs must be located on different nodes, because the failureDomain
is set to host
and the erasureCoded
chunk settings require at least 3 different OSDs (2 dataChunks
+ 1 codingChunks
).
See the Object Store CRD, for more detail on the settings available for a CephObjectStore
.
After the CephObjectStore
is created, the Rook operator will then create all the pools and other resources necessary to start the service. This may take a minute to complete.
Create an object store:
To confirm the object store is configured, wait for the RGW pod(s) to start:
To consume the object store, continue below in the section to Create a bucket.
Create Local Object Store(s) with Shared Pools¶
The below sample will create one or more object stores. Shared Ceph pools will be created, which reduces the overhead of additional Ceph pools for each additional object store.
Data isolation is enforced between the object stores with the use of Ceph RADOS namespaces. The separate RADOS namespaces do not allow access of the data across object stores.
Note
This sample requires at least 3 OSDs, with each OSD located on a different node.
The OSDs must be located on different nodes, because the failureDomain
is set to host
and the erasureCoded
chunk settings require at least 3 different OSDs (2 dataChunks
+ 1 codingChunks
).
Shared Pools¶
Create the shared pools that will be used by each of the object stores.
Note
If object stores have been previously created, the first pool below (.rgw.root
) does not need to be defined again as it would have already been created with an existing object store. There is only one .rgw.root
pool existing to store metadata for all object stores.
Create the shared pools:
Create Each Object Store¶
After the pools have been created above, create each object store to consume the shared pools.
Create the object store:
To confirm the object store is configured, wait for the RGW pod(s) to start:
Additional object stores can be created based on the same shared pools by simply changing the name
of the CephObjectStore. In the example manifests folder, two object store examples are provided: object-a.yaml
and object-b.yaml
.
To consume the object store, continue below in the section to Create a bucket. Modify the default example object store name from my-store
to the alternate name of the object store such as store-a
in this example.
Create Local Object Store(s) with pool placements¶
Attention
This feature is experimental.
This section contains a guide on how to configure RGW's pool placement and storage classes with Rook.
Object Storage API allows users to override where bucket data will be stored during bucket creation. With <LocationConstraint>
parameter in S3 API and X-Storage-Policy
header in SWIFT. Similarly, users can override where object data will be stored by setting X-Amz-Storage-Class
and X-Object-Storage-Class
during object creation.
To enable this feature, configure poolPlacements
representing a list of possible bucket data locations. Each poolPlacement
must have:
- a unique
name
to refer to it in<LocationConstraint>
orX-Storage-Policy
. Namedefault-placement
is reserved and can be used only if placement also marked asdefault
. - optional
default
flag to use given placement by default, meaning that it will be used if no location constraint is provided. Only one placement in the list can be marked as default. dataPoolName
andmetadataPoolName
representing object data and metadata locations. In Rook, these data locations are backed byCephBlockPool
.poolPlacements
andstorageClasses
specs refer pools by name. This means that all pools should be defined in advance. Similarly to sharedPools, the same pool can be reused across multiple ObjectStores and/or poolPlacements/storageClasses because of RADOS namespaces. Here, each pool will be namespaced with<object store name>.<placement name>.<pool type>
key.- optional
dataNonECPoolName
- extra pool for data that cannot use erasure coding (ex: multi-part uploads). If not set,metadataPoolName
will be used. - optional list of placement
storageClasses
. Classes defined per placement, which means that even classes ofdefault
placement will be available only within this placement and not others. Each placement will automatically have default storage class namedSTANDARD
.STANDARD
class always points to placementdataPoolName
and cannot be removed or redefined. Each storage class must have:name
(unique within placement). RGW allows arbitrary name for StorageClasses, however some clients/libs insist on AWS names so it is recommended to use one of the validx-amz-storage-class
values for better compatibility:STANDARD | REDUCED_REDUNDANCY | STANDARD_IA | ONEZONE_IA | INTELLIGENT_TIERING | GLACIER | DEEP_ARCHIVE | OUTPOSTS | GLACIER_IR | SNOW | EXPRESS_ONEZONE
. See AWS docs.dataPoolName
- overrides placement data pool when this class is selected by user.
Example: Configure CephObjectStore
with default
placement us
pools and placement europe
pointing to pools in corresponding geographies. These geographical locations are only an example. Placement name can be arbitrary and could reflect the backing pool's replication factor, device class, or failure domain. This example also defines storage class REDUCED_REDUNDANCY
for each placement.
S3 clients can direct objects into the pools defined in the above. The example below uses the s5cmd CLI tool which is pre-installed in the toolbox pod:
Connect to an External Object Store¶
Rook can connect to existing RGW gateways to work in conjunction with the external mode of the CephCluster
CRD. First, create a rgw-admin-ops-user
user in the Ceph cluster with the necessary caps:
The rgw-admin-ops-user
user is required by the Rook operator to manage buckets and users via the admin ops and s3 api. The multisite configuration needs to be specified only if the admin sets up multisite for RGW.
Then create a secret with the user credentials:
For an external CephCluster, configure Rook to consume external RGW servers with the following:
See object-external.yaml
for a more detailed example.
Even though multiple externalRgwEndpoints
can be specified, it is best to use a single endpoint. Only the first endpoint in the list will be advertised to any consuming resources like CephObjectStoreUsers, ObjectBucketClaims, or COSI resources. If there are multiple external RGW endpoints, add load balancer in front of them, then use the single load balancer endpoint in the externalRgwEndpoints
list.
Object store endpoint¶
The CephObjectStore resource status.info
contains endpoint
(and secureEndpoint
) fields, which report the endpoint that can be used to access the object store as a client. This endpoint is also advertised as the default endpoint for CephObjectStoreUsers, ObjectBucketClaims, and Container Object Store Interface (COSI) resources.
Each object store also creates a Kubernetes service that can be used as a client endpoint from within the Kubernetes cluster. The DNS name of the service is rook-ceph-rgw-<objectStoreName>.<objectStoreNamespace>.svc
. This service DNS name is the default endpoint
(and secureEndpoint
).
For external clusters, the default endpoint is the first spec.gateway.externalRgwEndpoint
instead of the service DNS name.
The advertised endpoint can be overridden using advertiseEndpoint
in the spec.hosting
config.
Rook always uses the advertised endpoint to perform management operations against the object store. When TLS is enabled, the TLS certificate must always specify the endpoint DNS name to allow secure management operations.
Create a Bucket¶
Info
This document is a guide for creating bucket with an Object Bucket Claim (OBC). To create a bucket with the experimental COSI Driver, see the COSI documentation.
Now that the object store is configured, next we need to create a bucket where a client can read and write objects. A bucket can be created by defining a storage class, similar to the pattern used by block and file storage. First, define the storage class that will allow object clients to create a bucket. The storage class defines the object storage system, the bucket retention policy, and other properties required by the administrator. Save the following as storageclass-bucket-delete.yaml
(the example is named as such due to the Delete
reclaim policy).
If you’ve deployed the Rook operator in a namespace other than rook-ceph
, change the prefix in the provisioner to match the namespace you used. For example, if the Rook operator is running in the namespace my-namespace
the provisioner value should be my-namespace.ceph.rook.io/bucket
.
Based on this storage class, an object client can now request a bucket by creating an Object Bucket Claim (OBC). When the OBC is created, the Rook bucket provisioner will create a new bucket. Notice that the OBC references the storage class that was created above. Save the following as object-bucket-claim-delete.yaml
(the example is named as such due to the Delete
reclaim policy):
Now that the claim is created, the operator will create the bucket as well as generate other artifacts to enable access to the bucket. A secret and ConfigMap are created with the same name as the OBC and in the same namespace. The secret contains credentials used by the application pod to access the bucket. The ConfigMap contains bucket endpoint information and is also consumed by the pod. See the Object Bucket Claim Documentation for more details on the CephObjectBucketClaims
.
Client Connections¶
The following commands extract key pieces of information from the secret and configmap:"
If any hosting.dnsNames
are set in the CephObjectStore
CRD, S3 clients can access buckets in virtual-host-style. Otherwise, S3 clients must be configured to use path-style access.
Consume the Object Storage¶
Now that you have the object store configured and a bucket created, you can consume the object storage from an S3 client.
This section will guide you through testing the connection to the CephObjectStore
and uploading and downloading from it. Run the following commands after you have connected to the Rook toolbox.
Connection Environment Variables¶
To simplify the s3 client commands, you will want to set the four environment variables for use by your client (ie. inside the toolbox). See above for retrieving the variables for a bucket created by an ObjectBucketClaim
.
Host
: The DNS host name where the rgw service is found in the cluster. Assuming you are using the defaultrook-ceph
cluster, it will berook-ceph-rgw-my-store.rook-ceph.svc
.Port
: The endpoint where the rgw service is listening. Runkubectl -n rook-ceph get svc rook-ceph-rgw-my-store
, to get the port.Access key
: The user'saccess_key
as printed aboveSecret key
: The user'ssecret_key
as printed above
The variables for the user generated in this example might be:
The access key and secret key can be retrieved as described in the section above on client connections or below in the section creating a user if you are not creating the buckets with an ObjectBucketClaim
.
Configure s5cmd¶
To test the CephObjectStore
, set the object store credentials in the toolbox pod that contains the s5cmd
tool.
Important
The default toolbox.yaml does not contain the s5cmd. The toolbox must be started with the rook operator image (toolbox-operator-image), which does contain s5cmd.
PUT or GET an object¶
Upload a file to the newly created bucket
Download and verify the file from the bucket
Monitoring health¶
Rook configures health probes on the deployment created for CephObjectStore gateways. Refer to the CRD document for information about configuring the probes and monitoring the deployment status.
Access External to the Cluster¶
Rook sets up the object storage so pods will have access internal to the cluster. If your applications are running outside the cluster, you will need to setup an external service through a NodePort
.
First, note the service that exposes RGW internal to the cluster. We will leave this service intact and create a new service for external access.
Save the external service as rgw-external.yaml
:
Now create the external service.
See both rgw services running and notice what port the external service is running on:
Internally the rgw service is running on port 80
. The external port in this case is 31536
. Now you can access the CephObjectStore
from anywhere! All you need is the hostname for any machine in the cluster, the external port, and the user credentials.
Create a User¶
If you need to create an independent set of user credentials to access the S3 endpoint, create a CephObjectStoreUser
. The user will be used to connect to the RGW service in the cluster using the S3 API. The user will be independent of any object bucket claims that you might have created in the earlier instructions in this document.
See the Object Store User CRD for more detail on the settings available for a CephObjectStoreUser
.
When the CephObjectStoreUser
is created, the Rook operator will then create the RGW user on the specified CephObjectStore
and store the Access Key and Secret Key in a kubernetes secret in the same namespace as the CephObjectStoreUser
.
The AccessKey and SecretKey data fields can be mounted in a pod as an environment variable. More information on consuming kubernetes secrets can be found in the K8s secret documentation
To directly retrieve the secrets:
Enable TLS¶
TLS is critical for securing object storage data access, and it is assumed as a default by many S3 clients. TLS is enabled for CephObjectStores by configuring gateway
options. Set securePort
, and give Rook access to a TLS certificate using sslCertificateRef
. caBundleRef
may be necessary as well to give the deployed gateway (RGW) access to the TLS certificate's CA signing bundle.
Ceph RGW only supports a single TLS certificate. If the given TLS certificate is a concatenation of multiple certificates, only the first certificate will be used by the RGW as the server certificate. Therefore, the TLS certificate given must include all endpoints that clients will use for access as subject alternate names (SANs).
The CephObjectStore service endpoint must be added as a SAN on the TLS certificate. If it is not possible to add the service DNS name as a SAN on the TLS certificate, set hosting.advertiseEndpoint
to a TLS-approved endpoint to help ensure Rook and clients use secure data access.
Note
OpenShift users can use add service.beta.openshift.io/serving-cert-secret-name
as a service annotation instead of using sslCertificateRef
.
Virtual host-style Bucket Access¶
The Ceph Object Gateway supports accessing buckets using virtual host-style addressing, which allows addressing buckets using the bucket name as a subdomain in the endpoint.
AWS has deprecated the the alternative path-style addressing mode which is Rook and Ceph's default. As a result, many end-user applications have begun to remove path-style support entirely. Many production clusters will have to enable virtual host-style address.
Virtual host-style addressing requires 2 things:
- An endpoint that supports wildcard addressing
- CephObjectStore hosting configuration.
Wildcard addressing can be configured in myriad ways. Some options:
- Kubernetes ingress loadbalancer
- Openshift DNS operator
The minimum recommended hosting
configuration is exemplified below. It is important to ensure that Rook advertises the wildcard-addressable endpoint as a priority over the default. TLS is also recommended for security, and the configured TLS certificate should specify the advertise endpoint.
A more complex hosting
configuration is exemplified below. In this example, two wildcard-addressable endpoints are available. One is a wildcard-addressable ingress service that is accessible to clients outside of the Kubernetes cluster (s3.ingress.domain.com
). The other is a wildcard-addressable Kubernetes cluster service (s3.rook-ceph.svc
). The cluster service is the preferred advertise endpoint because the internal service avoids the possibility of the ingress service's router being a bottleneck for S3 client operations.
Object Multisite¶
Multisite is a feature of Ceph that allows object stores to replicate its data over multiple Ceph clusters.
Multisite also allows object stores to be independent and isolated from other object stores in a cluster.
For more information on multisite please read the ceph multisite overview for how to run it.
Using Swift and Keystone¶
It is possible to access an object store using the Swift API. Using Swift requires the use of OpenStack Keystone as an authentication provider.
More information on the use of Swift and Keystone can be found in the document on Object Store with Keystone and Swift.